|
1
|
- Claude Ostyn
- February 2005
|
|
2
|
- Introductions
- Paradigm shifts (maybe)
- Business context for online learning
- Systematic learning model and ISD
- A workflow model for designed learning
- How standards help – the role of SCORM
- Designed learning workflow learning automation
- What about collaborative learning?
- Short circuits and shortcuts
- Q&A
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- 20th Century
- Stable career tracks
- Slow change
- Just in case training
- EPSS vs. LMS
- Training content
- Workbooks
- PowerPoint
- CBT
- Expensive simulations
- Cycles
- 21st Century
- Unstable everything
- Accelerating change
- Workflow learning
- Performance Management
Competency management
- Training content
- More of the same
- Google
- IM
- Game based rich simulation
- Cycles
- Performance evaluations
- Seconds, minutes, days, months
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Less reinvention of basics – focus on important stuff
- Reuse and cannibalization possibilities
- Easier mixing and matching of services
- Avoid vendor lock-in
- Facilitate exchanges with new trading partners
- Support SOA
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Standards based services help workflow automation
- Some things will never be standardized
- That is good! Standards are enablers, not complete solutions
- Different reasons for different situations
- Not cost effective, no economy of scale
- Dogmatic issues won’t allow it
- Conformance would be impoverishing, too restrictive
- Proprietary lock-in is built into business model
- Workflow automation can support different user classes
- Managers who just want to pick and choose
- Instructional designers who want to save time
- Junior designers who can benefit from templates and models created by
experts
- Learners who can create their own learning program
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Can be integrated with online learning activity package
- Collaborative learning activity can be described by a digital learning
object
- Basic instructions
- Link to resource or specific directions
- Can be used at will, or included in sequence and use self-report or
other method to track usage is required.
- Can be integrated at management level
- Learning management system should track competency status (a.k.a.
objective status), not just coursework
- Learning management system should accept competency evidence from
different sources
- SCORM 2004 provides standard way to allow online package to take
competency status into account for sequencing
|
|
13
|
- Some shortcut scenarios
- Manager or employee finds learning resources in seconds
- Intructional designer leverages existing competency model
- Assessment results in a “prescription” for training
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Contact
Claude Ostyn
Ostyn Consulting
Claude@Ostyn.com
http://www.ostyn.com/resources.htm for more resources
- SCORM info
Official web site: www.adlnet.org
|